Tuesday, May 11, 2010

Community-Centered

To continue the discussion of Anderson's chapter and relate it to our ISWO discussions... Anderson refers to How People Learn by Bransford, Brown and Cocking and discusses their argument that effective learning is community-centered, knowledge-centered, learner-centered and assessment-centered.

Unit 1 of ISWO took up the topic of community and community-building in online courses and participants raised a number of issues around the importance of lack of importance of community. Some pointed to ways that they build community in f2f classes and are looking for ways to do that online. Others pointed out that some students aren't really interested in developing community with their online peers – they just want to get the content and get on with it. Still others drew attention to readings and their own experience and discussed the difference between cohort and community. Several people offered their ideas of ways to build community in online environments.

Anderson describes a number of people who promote community, including Wenger (members of a learning community both support an challenge each other, leading to effective and relevant knowledge construction) and Wilson (participants share a sense of belonging, trust, expectation of learning, and commitment to participate in and contribute to the community.) But he also points to writing of others who discuss the difficulty of achieving community online... “I short, it may be more challenging than we think to create and sustain these [virtual] communities... linked to lack of placedness and synchronicity in time and place, the mere absence of body language, and the development of social presence.”

He agrees that many online students may no be looking for community, “Contrary to popular belief, the major motivation for enrolment in distance education is not physical access per se, but the temporal freedom that allows students to move through the course of studies at a time and pace of their own choice. Participation in a community of learners almost inevitably places constraints upon this independence... The demands of a learning-centered context at times may force us to modify the most proscriptive participation in communities of learning, even though we have evidence that such participation will likely advance knowledge creation and attention.”

It seems that Anderson might agree with ISWO participants in that it would help to get to know learner needs, expectations and commitment as well as discuss/negotiate roles and responsibilities early in the course. This might allow us to provide some flexibility for learners and at the same time make our own thinking clear to them.

1 comment:

  1. Hi BJ,

    One factor that I don't see as often as I'd expect to is the role of content. Perhaps some content is more conducive to the "lone free ranger" approach while other types of content truly don't require community. Have your readings led you to anything to support that idea?

    And then there is Seth Godin's ideas on "tribes" - the old concept with a new life because of the way communities can form based on "silos of interest" via social media.
    http://www.ted.com/talks/seth_godin_on_the_tribes_we_lead.html
    (this is his TED talk)

    In this talk he notes (among a lot of other great things) that the communities can form and reform and that it isn't necessarily a problem if a tribe is transient. It's not about force or necessity, but rather about wanting to connect when it makes sense to do so.

    ReplyDelete